Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

The Federal Government and Harm Reduction

by August 14, 2025
August 14, 2025

Jeffrey Miron

harm reduction

On July 24, President Trump signed an executive order that, among other things, eliminates funding for harm reduction programs. Such programs (syringe services, naloxone and fentanyl test-strip distribution, overdose prevention sites) acknowledge that risky drug use will occur and focus on minimizing the health, social, and economic harms of those behaviors, rather than advocating for abstinence.

These programs appear to generate beneficial effects: needle exchange programs reduce the prevalence of HIV; supervised injection clinics save money and relieve disease burden from the healthcare system; and pharmacy-based intranasal naloxone distribution reduces opioid overdoses.

Yet federal funding of harm reduction has downsides. Such funding might appear to lower the cost of drug abuse, and even if this effect is minor, the perception makes the politics of legalization difficult. Convincing voters to accept other people’s drug use is one thing; convincing them to “pay for it” is another.

At the same time, the federal government should not impede state, local, or private support for harm reduction. Currently, federal law bans opening a safe injection site or drug “consumption room,” and the federal government can seize anything “primarily intended” for drug use, including drug-checking gear like fentanyl test strips.

The proper approach to harm reduction is legalization. By eliminating underground markets, this reduces the incentive for dealers to lace their substances with fentanyl while allowing consumers to protect themselves through legal channels. Legalization would allow for the safe purchase of needles, reducing disease transmission from needle-sharing. And while some claim that legalizing needles increases drug overdoses, recent research finds otherwise. Finally, legalization reduces the many ills of underground markets, such as violence and corruption.

In short, the safest—and most principled—way to curb drug-related harms is for Washington to abstain from either subsidizing or criminalizing and instead allow individual decisions and private mechanisms to balance the harms and benefits of drug use.

This article appeared on Substack on August 14, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

previous post
The Nvidia/AMD-Trump Deal: Legal Questions, Crony Capitalism, and National Security for Sale
next post
Freedom of Silence? England Investigating a Woman for a Wordless Vigil

You may also like

Friday Feature: Gilmer’s Learning Solutions

September 12, 2025

How Many Arrests Were Made? FinCEN Director Doesn’t...

September 12, 2025

Three Things You Should Know About the Record...

September 12, 2025

Politically Motivated Violence Is Rare in the United...

September 11, 2025

SOAR Act Update Could Unlock More Scholarship Funds...

September 11, 2025

The Toxic Legacy of 9/11…and How to End...

September 11, 2025

Trump Industrial Policy Delivers Make-Work Jobs

September 11, 2025

The President Should Not Have a License to...

September 10, 2025

Are Neoliberalism and Globalization Undermining Democracy?

September 10, 2025

The Latest National Test Scores: More Bad Productivity...

September 9, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2024 InsiderMarketSense.com All Rights Reserved.

Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick