Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

“MEGA” Bill Supersizes the Federal Government’s Role in Election Administration

by January 29, 2026
January 29, 2026

Stephen Richer

Media Name: 201312_federalism.jpg

When President Trump issued his March 25, 2025, executive order on election administration, both Walter Olson and I sympathized with its policy aims, but we wrote that it unlawfully usurped legislative authority and trampled on federalism.

The newly unveiled Make Elections Great Again Act (“MEGA”), introduced by Representative Bryan Steil (R‑Wisc.), recognizes that the legislative branch, not the executive, is the appropriate forum for changing law. That’s great.

But the MEGA Act, like President Trump’s executive order and like the For The People Act supported by Democrats in 2021, still violates principles of federalism. Election administration is one of the few remaining areas of American policy that is still largely determined by the states. And that’s a good thing. Federalism in election administration allows states to recognize their unique attributes (e.g., western states support mail voting because of the larger geographic distances), it strengthens election security (there isn’t one hack that can disrupt all 50 states), and it encourages democratic entrepreneurship (states can test different ideas and learn from each other).

The MEGA Act is 83 pages long and imposes federal control over many facets of election administration. Some rights currently enjoyed by the states that would no longer be permitted include:

  • States could no longer allow universal mail balloting (as is done in many western states, including Utah, California, and Oregon).
     
  • States could no longer accept mail ballots that are sent on Election Day, but arrive after Election Day (as is allowed in 14 states and Washington, DC). 
     
  • States could no longer use ranked choice voting to determine their federal delegation (as is done in Alaska currently).
     
  • States could no longer allow voters to give their sealed mail ballot packets to their neighbors for delivery (as is allowed in 18 states)

Minimum thresholds are an appropriate place for Congress to act. For example, I support the call for requiring universal documented proof of citizenship. 

But many of the above items get into the nitty-gritty of election administration. Let’s leave those items to the states. A supersized, MEGA federal government in charge of everything should not be our aspiration.

previous post
State-sponsored Homicide in Minneapolis and the New Gun Rights Debate
next post
Addiction, Central Planning, and the Illusion of Recovery—Why Trump’s Great American Recovery Initiative Misses the Point

You may also like

Friday Feature: Sudbury Valley School

February 13, 2026

FTC Continues to Confuse Free Expression and Censorship...

February 13, 2026

Congress’s Rejection of Trump’s Canada “Emergency” Is a...

February 13, 2026

Federal Judge: Government Is Not Above the Law,...

February 13, 2026

CBO Warns of Ballooning Deficits in Latest Fiscal...

February 12, 2026

Immigration Restrictions Cause Enforcement Excesses

February 12, 2026

Removing US Troops from Al-Tanf, Syria, Is the...

February 12, 2026

Federal Power Grab On Voting Still Flunks Basic...

February 12, 2026

FBI Assessments: A First Amendment and Surveillance Nightmare

February 12, 2026

Pretending the CFPB Works as Intended Blocks Reform

February 12, 2026
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2024 InsiderMarketSense.com All Rights Reserved.

Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick