Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Cato Experts React to U.S. Attacks on Iran

by February 28, 2026
February 28, 2026

Jon Hoffman, Brandan P. Buck, and Katherine Thompson

President Donald Trump says the U.S. has begun “major combat operations” in Iran after Israel also said it ⁠had launched missile attacks against the country. 

In response, Cato foreign policy experts have released the following statements: 

Jon Hoffman, Research Fellow: 

Trump’s decision to bomb Iran is indefensible. This was not about preempting an imminent threat—it was a strategically misguided power play, with no discernible endgame. Vague objectives, inflated threat perceptions, and regime-change fantasies threaten to pull the United States into a costly war that Americans don’t want. The United States is barreling toward another Middle East crisis of its own making.

Brandan Buck, Research Fellow: 

The President’s use of military force in Iran risks drawing the United States into yet another open-ended conflict in the Middle East, with no plausible casus belli, no congressional authorization, and no clear conception of victory. This action contradicts the administration’s own national security strategy, which explicitly sought to shift American attention away from decades of “fruitless ‘nation-building’ wars.” Instead, the President is repeating the same pattern of strategic self-deceit that has ensnared his predecessors—promising limited action while inviting prolonged conflict.

Katherine Thompson, Senior Research Fellow: 

The President’s use of offensive military force against Iran is a clear and blatant overreach of executive authority. Under the Constitution, the power to take the nation to war belongs to the United States Congress. The President’s decision puts U.S. forces and bases in the region in the crosshairs of retaliation. Defending American personnel—and Israel—against sustained attacks beyond what we saw during Operation Midnight Hammer is poised to strain already finite U.S. defensive resources. War is not abstract. It costs American blood and treasure. The Founders placed the power to initiate it in Congress precisely to ensure those costs are confronted and debated before the country walks into battle.

previous post
Anthropic Just Showed What Doing the Right Thing Looks Like
next post
Argentina’s Labor Reform Is a Step in the Right Direction

You may also like

What’s at Stake for All of Us in...

March 9, 2026

Is Illegal Immigration a Crime?

March 9, 2026

Clinging to WWII Analogies in Iran War Is...

March 6, 2026

Friday Feature: Baker Creek Academy and TrailblazED

March 6, 2026

The Forgotten National Guard Case: DC v. Trump

March 6, 2026

Digital Euro Is for Sanctions Evasion

March 6, 2026

Trump’s War Insurance Decree Follows Predictable Pattern

March 5, 2026

Americans Trust Their Doctors More Than Federal Health...

March 5, 2026

The ROAD to Letting Treasury Pick Winners and...

March 4, 2026

For-Profit Teacher Training

March 4, 2026
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2024 InsiderMarketSense.com All Rights Reserved.

Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick