Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

End Fed Ed Watch: March 2026

by March 10, 2026
March 10, 2026

Neal McCluskey

As I wrote when presenting the inaugural End Fed Ed Watch last month, there was considerable excitement about a year ago when the Trump administration was focusing on eliminating the US Department of Education. But as you would expect with any long-term effort, the energy behind it subsided. With inevitably waning national attention on ending the department and the proliferation of developments around the effort, it is easy to lose track of what is happening. End Fed Ed Watch is here to help keep you up to date. 

Note that, as part of tracking what the administration has been doing, we have added a tracker showing which Department of Education functions are now being administered on a day-to-day basis by other agencies via interagency agreements.

Congress

There are currently six bills to eliminate the department. None have changed their status in the last month, except that H.R. 2691 gained a cosponsor, rising from 3 to 4.

The Administration

The Trump administration announced two new Department of Education interagency agreements: one with the State Department and one with the Department of Labor. They are the top entries on the interagency agreement tracker below.

Courts

The following are court cases directly related to the Trump administration’s efforts to downsize or eliminate the Department of Education. The only change from last month was that a federal judge denied a Department of Education motion to dismiss AEFP & IHEP v. McMahon. We also eliminated State of New York, et al. v. US Department of Education, et al., which dealt with withholding COVID-19 relief funds rather than downsizing or eliminating the department.

Cato Work

Over the previous month, Cato Center for Educational Freedom scholars published the following regarding downsizing or eliminating the Department of Education:

  • “The Reform That Would Mark the Beginning of the End for the Department of Education”: At National Review, CEF research fellow Andrew Gillen explains why federal student loans should be moved to the Treasury Department as soon as possible. Treasury already has much to do with federal student lending, is focused on financial insturments, and it would be a big chunk out of the Department of Education.

You can help!

Anything missing or incorrect here? Please contact Center for Educational Freedom Director Neal McCluskey at nmccluskey@​cato.​org. 

previous post
New Trade Agreements, With or Without the US, Should Be Negotiated Within the WTO

You may also like

New Trade Agreements, With or Without the US,...

March 10, 2026

The Pentagon’s Retaliation Campaign Against Anthropic Is Unconstitutional

March 10, 2026

Wealth Taxes Raise Less Revenue Than You Think

March 10, 2026

What’s at Stake for All of Us in...

March 9, 2026

Is Illegal Immigration a Crime?

March 9, 2026

Clinging to WWII Analogies in Iran War Is...

March 6, 2026

Friday Feature: Baker Creek Academy and TrailblazED

March 6, 2026

The Forgotten National Guard Case: DC v. Trump

March 6, 2026

Digital Euro Is for Sanctions Evasion

March 6, 2026

Trump’s War Insurance Decree Follows Predictable Pattern

March 5, 2026
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2024 InsiderMarketSense.com All Rights Reserved.

Insider Market Sense
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick